Blaze Vault Online Backup Suite v5.x
Whitepaper – Backup speed

Version 5.x
Aug 2008

Download PDF version.

Table of Content

1     Introduction

2     Testing Configuration and Setup
       2.1       Hardware and Software Setup.
       2.2       Test Scenarios

3     Results
       3.1       Upload Time
       3.2       Observations
       3.3       Conclusion

Introduction

This document contains results of the test on backup speeds for the backup operation between Blaze Vault Offsite Backup Server and Blaze Vault Online Backup Client. It serves as a reference for partners and customers in planning their hardware and network capacity.

Testing Configuration and Setup

Hardware and Software Setup

The list of hardware and software is shown in the following table.

 

Hardware

Software

Backup Server
(Backup destination)

  • Intel Xeon 2.8GHz CPU
  • 2GB ram
  • RedHat Enterprise Linux AS4
  • Blaze Vault Offsite Backup Server v.5.0.1.4

Client Workstation
(Backup source)

  • Intel Pentium Dual-Core CPU 3.2 GHz
  • 2GB ram
  • Windows 2003 Server
  • Blaze Vault Online Backup Manager v.5.0.1.4

Test Scenarios

Overview

In the test, there are 4 file backup sets, each contains files of different numbers and sizes as described in the following table.


File Backup Set

Average file size

Total number of files

Number of folders

Total Size (GB)

Compressed Size (GB)

Small-files

2Kb

1903685

1007

2.45

1.96

Medium-files

200Kb

10000

1010

2.38

1.90

Large-files

20Mb

100

10

2.44

1.95

Huge-files

200Mb

10

1

2.44

1.95

Test Cases

All the 4 backup sets are with the following settings:

We have tested with different network bandwidths (uplink) for each of the backup set. The network constraint was achieved by limiting the bandwidth of the particular backup account with the following assumptions:

And the results are outlined in the next section.

^Back to Top.

Results

Upload Time

The time required for the backup operations with different network bandwidth are summarized below:


Test Case

Network Bandwidth (down/up)

Actual / Compressed Size (GB)

Time taken (HH:MM:SS)

Transfer rate (MB/min)

Small-files
(2Kb)

ADSL (1.5Mbps/640Kbps)

2.45 / 1.96

15:12:17

2.2

SDSL (2Mbps/2Mbps)

2.45 / 1.96

05:22:41

6.22

T1

2.45 / 1.96

05:22:09

6.23

LAN

2.45 / 1.96

05:21:38

6.24

Medium-files
(200Kb)

ADSL (1.5Mbps/640Kbps)

2.38 / 1.90

13:04:31

2.48

SDSL (2Mbps/2Mbps)

2.38 / 1.90

04:23:38

7.38

T1

2.38 / 1.90

03:10:22

10.22

LAN

2.38 / 1.90

00:49:37

39.21

Large-files
(20Mb)

ADSL (1.5Mbps/640Kbps)

2.44 / 1.95

13:12:23

2.52

SDSL (2Mbps/2Mbps)

2.44 / 1.95

04:29:07

7.42

T1

2.44 / 1.95

03:05:14

10.78

LAN

2.44 / 1.95

00:31:24

63.6

Huge-files
(200Mb)

ADSL (1.5Mbps/640Kbps)

2.44 / 1.95

13:38:22

2.44

SDSL (2Mbps/2Mbps)

2.44 / 1.95

04:25:11

7.53

T1

2.44 / 1.95

03:12:11

10.39

LAN

2.44 / 1.95

00:59:57

33.31

^Back to Top.

Observations

For a backup set with a large number of small files, there is not much improvement in the backup speed even though the bandwidth has been increased. The bottleneck is thus on client workstation where the files are being processed and encrypted.
For a backup set with an average number of medium-sized files, increasing the uplink bandwidth does improve the backup speed by a significant amount. This reflects that, with lesser number of files, the bottleneck is switched to the network instead. In other words, the larger the number of files, the more processing is required on the client machine.
And for a backup set with smaller number of large files, similar patterns are observed. Namely, the backup speed is significantly improved when the uplink bandwidth is increased.

Conclusion

The time required for a backup (or backup speed) depends very much on the backup set’s constitution. Other than uploading a large number of files (over 2 million files) in a single backup, network latency is the major constraint on the backup speed.
In general, for a large number of small files (e.g. File system backup), the uplink bandwidth is relatively less important as the stress would be on the CPU of the source machine. In this case, a more powerful client machine could improve the backup speed. On the other hand, with smaller number of big files (e.g. MS Exchange, MS SQL backups), the available uplink bandwidth would have bigger impact on the overall backup speed.
At the planning stage, system administrators should choose the most cost-effective bandwidth in their situations. Following are some of the factors that they might need to consider:

View more Blaze Vault White papers.