Version 5.x
Aug 2008
1 Introduction
2 Testing Configuration and Setup
2.1 Hardware and Software Setup.
2.2 Test Scenarios
3 Results
3.1 Upload Time
3.2 Observations
3.3 Conclusion
This document contains results of the test on backup speeds for the backup operation between Blaze Vault Offsite Backup Server and Blaze Vault Online Backup Client. It serves as a reference for partners and customers in planning their hardware and network capacity.
The list of hardware and software is shown in the following table.
|
Hardware |
Software |
Backup Server |
|
|
Client Workstation |
|
|
In the test, there are 4 file backup sets, each contains files of different numbers and sizes as described in the following table.
File Backup Set |
Average file size |
Total number of files |
Number of folders |
Total Size (GB) |
Compressed Size (GB) |
Small-files |
2Kb |
1903685 |
1007 |
2.45 |
1.96 |
Medium-files |
200Kb |
10000 |
1010 |
2.38 |
1.90 |
Large-files |
20Mb |
100 |
10 |
2.44 |
1.95 |
Huge-files |
200Mb |
10 |
1 |
2.44 |
1.95 |
All the 4 backup sets are with the following settings:
We have tested with different network bandwidths (uplink) for each of the backup set. The network constraint was achieved by limiting the bandwidth of the particular backup account with the following assumptions:
And the results are outlined in the next section.
The time required for the backup operations with different network bandwidth are summarized below:
Test Case |
Network Bandwidth (down/up) |
Actual / Compressed Size (GB) |
Time taken (HH:MM:SS) |
Transfer rate (MB/min) |
Small-files |
ADSL (1.5Mbps/640Kbps) |
2.45 / 1.96 |
15:12:17 |
2.2 |
SDSL (2Mbps/2Mbps) |
2.45 / 1.96 |
05:22:41 |
6.22 |
|
T1 |
2.45 / 1.96 |
05:22:09 |
6.23 |
|
LAN |
2.45 / 1.96 |
05:21:38 |
6.24 |
|
Medium-files |
ADSL (1.5Mbps/640Kbps) |
2.38 / 1.90 |
13:04:31 |
2.48 |
SDSL (2Mbps/2Mbps) |
2.38 / 1.90 |
04:23:38 |
7.38 |
|
T1 |
2.38 / 1.90 |
03:10:22 |
10.22 |
|
LAN |
2.38 / 1.90 |
00:49:37 |
39.21 |
|
Large-files |
ADSL (1.5Mbps/640Kbps) |
2.44 / 1.95 |
13:12:23 |
2.52 |
SDSL (2Mbps/2Mbps) |
2.44 / 1.95 |
04:29:07 |
7.42 |
|
T1 |
2.44 / 1.95 |
03:05:14 |
10.78 |
|
LAN |
2.44 / 1.95 |
00:31:24 |
63.6 |
|
Huge-files |
ADSL (1.5Mbps/640Kbps) |
2.44 / 1.95 |
13:38:22 |
2.44 |
SDSL (2Mbps/2Mbps) |
2.44 / 1.95 |
04:25:11 |
7.53 |
|
T1 |
2.44 / 1.95 |
03:12:11 |
10.39 |
|
LAN |
2.44 / 1.95 |
00:59:57 |
33.31 |
For a backup set with a large number of small files, there is not much improvement in the backup speed even though the bandwidth has been increased. The bottleneck is thus on client workstation where the files are being processed and encrypted.
For a backup set with an average number of medium-sized files, increasing the uplink bandwidth does improve the backup speed by a significant amount. This reflects that, with lesser number of files, the bottleneck is switched to the network instead. In other words, the larger the number of files, the more processing is required on the client machine.
And for a backup set with smaller number of large files, similar patterns are observed. Namely, the backup speed is significantly improved when the uplink bandwidth is increased.
The time required for a backup (or backup speed) depends very much on the backup set’s constitution. Other than uploading a large number of files (over 2 million files) in a single backup, network latency is the major constraint on the backup speed.
In general, for a large number of small files (e.g. File system backup), the uplink bandwidth is relatively less important as the stress would be on the CPU of the source machine. In this case, a more powerful client machine could improve the backup speed. On the other hand, with smaller number of big files (e.g. MS Exchange, MS SQL backups), the available uplink bandwidth would have bigger impact on the overall backup speed.
At the planning stage, system administrators should choose the most cost-effective bandwidth in their situations. Following are some of the factors that they might need to consider: